ai regulation

Events

images/02_events/TM%20Vorlessung%20Alle.jpg#joomlaImage://local-images/02_events/TM Vorlessung Alle.jpg?width=800&height=300
Wednesday, June 3th, 2026 | 18:15 - 19:45 p.m.

Public Lecture Series: Taming the Machines. Uneven Datafication: Political Economy of Digital Colonial Capitalism

Flü­gelbau Ost, 2. OG, Raum O 221 Ed­mund-Siemers-Allee 1, 20146 Ham­burg

Prof. Dr. Azadeh Akbari, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, DE

This paper develops the concept of uneven datafication, drawing on literature on coloniality, uneven development, and dependency theory. Uneven datafication refers to uneven development in the contemporary political economy of data, showing how global cycles of differentiation and totalisation perpetuate inequality to sustain capitalist structures. Datafication is neither homogeneous nor universal, but marked by colonial continuities, spatial differentiation, and temporal unevenness. Uneven datafication operates through three interrelated dynamics. First, territorialisation,  deterritorialisation, and reterritorialisation produce uneven geographies of digital colonial capitalism, from datafied bodies to platform infrastructures and space-based data centres. Second, dispossession enacts spatial, temporal, and dehumanising violence, ranking populations as more or less valuable and enforcing biopower ‘within’ and necropower ‘beyond’. Third, unequal exchange sustains asymmetrical valuation and circulation of data and data labour, enabling Big Tech and core economies to extract surplus value from peripheral regions.
Uneven datafication thus sustains colonial capitalist accumulation through differentiated dispossession and dependency across populations, spaces, and classes.

Institutions
  • UHH
images/02_events/TM%20Vorlessung%20Alle.jpg#joomlaImage://local-images/02_events/TM Vorlessung Alle.jpg?width=800&height=300
Wednesday, November 26th, 2025 | 18:15 - 19:45 p.m.

Public Lecture Series: Taming the Machines. What, if anything, are convivial technologies?

Main Building, Edmund-Siemers-Allee 1, Flü­gelbau Ost, 2. OG, Raum O221

Prof. Dr. Darian Meacham (Maastricht University, NL)

The distinction between “convivial” and “monopolistic” technologies, introduced in the 1970s by the philosopher Ivan Illich, was the foundation for a radical critique of contemporary technological society (Illich 1973). This key distinction was adopted in a critique of technology and economic reason (Gorz 1988) by French critical phenomenology (avant la lettre).
This talk will focus on how this distinction between convivial and monopolistic (or non-convivial) technologies can support a critical phenomenology of technology. I will argue that Gorz attempts to do just this, but that his development of the “convivial – un-convivial” distinction in terms of a broader account of “autonomy” vs “heteronomy” would benefit from a more phenomenologically grounded account of autonomy. I will pose (and try to address) the question of whether a more embodied account of autonomy, such as developed within the context of enactive approaches to cognition would serve such an aim.
A third step will be to ask if and how an enactively enriched notion of autonomy, when situated within the critique of technology and economic rationality, can contribute to the development of programmes for “concrete utopias”.

Institutions

  • UHH

Universität Hamburg
Adeline Scharfenberg
Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein. 

Universität Hamburg
Adeline Scharfenberg
Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein. 

Universität Hamburg
Adeline Scharfenberg
Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.