Prof. Øyvind Breivik (University of Bergen)
The recent advances in ML or AI modelling of the atmosphere and the ocean have upended decades of conventional wisdom - namely that the way forward is higher resolution and better parameterizations of what remains unresolved. Here I will present a handful of examples of how forecasting and modelling the atmosphere and the ocean can be done using graph neural networks and more traditional convolutional neural networks. The big question is then whether we are headed toward a future where models in the traditional sense become obsolete? I will argue that on the contrary, we need the models to guide (supervise) machine learning and artificial intelligence. However, the current use of numerical models is not fit for purpose and we need to rethink what type of numerical models we use for the training. We also need to be aware of the common pitfalls in machine learning - perhaps most importantly how ML models handle previously "unseen" cases, whether these come in the form of extreme weather events or in modelling a future climate very different from what the models have been trained on.
Institutions
The global mean surface temperature record combining sea surface and near-surface air data is central to understanding climate variability and change. Understanding the past record also helps constrain uncertainty in future climate projections. In my talk, I will present a recent study (Sippel et al., 2024, Nature, doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08230-1) that refines our view of the historical record and explore its implications for near-future climate risk.
Past temperature record: The early temperature record (before ~1950) remains uncertain due to evolving methods, limited documentation, and sparse coverage. Independent reconstructions show that historical ocean temperatures were likely measured too cold by about 0.26 °C compared to land estimates despite strong agreement in other periods. This cold bias cannot be explained by natural variability; multiple lines of evidence (climate attribution, timescale analysis, coastal data, palaeoclimate records) support a substantial cold bias in early ocean records. While overall warming since the mid-19th century is unchanged, correcting the bias reduces early-20th-century warming trends, lowers global decadal variability, and brings models and observations into closer alignment.
Constraining climate risk: I will close my talk by discussing how these findings sharpen near-future temperature projections and our understanding of climate risk; and furthermore how new AI methods may provide an even clearer picture of past climate and near-future climate risk.
Institutions
Anselm Fehnker, Senior AI Projektmanager am Artificial Intelligence Center Hamburg (ARIC) e.V.
Louisa Rockstedt, Projektmanagerin am Artificial Intelligence Center Hamburg (ARIC) e.V.
Künstliche Intelligenz gilt als Schlüsseltechnologie der Zukunft. Doch was kann sie beitragen, wenn es um eines unserer wichtigsten und zugleich am stärksten bedrohten Güter, dem Wasser, geht? Und worauf müssen wir achten, um technologische Innovation mit ökologischer Verantwortung zu verbinden?
In diesem Vortrag werfen wir einen Blick auf die Schnittstelle zwischen KI, Wasser und Klimakrise. Anhand konkreter Beispiele aus Forschung und Praxis beleuchten wir verschiedene Perspektiven: Wie kann KI helfen, Überschwemmungen, Dürren und Wasserverschmutzung frühzeitig zu erkennen? Können smarte Technologien zur effizienteren Nutzung und Einsparung von Wasser beitragen? Und welche Risiken bringt KI selbst für Umwelt und Wasser mit sich?
Wir freuen uns darauf, mit euch im schönen Ambiente der Speicherstadt sowohl die Potenziale als auch die Herausforderungen von KI im Kontext der ökologischen Transformation zu reflektieren und gemeinsam zu diskutieren.
Institutions
Universität Hamburg
Adeline Scharfenberg
Universität Hamburg
Adeline Scharfenberg
Universität Hamburg
Adeline Scharfenberg